Blue and green investment charts

The Wisconsin 30 Index is an equal-weighted stock index that is updated annually on December 31.

The index was originally constructed to reflect the 30 largest Wisconsin stocks based on market capitalization. The index is rebalanced on an annual basis to reflect year-end market capitalizations. Returns prior to 12/31/24 are based on the original constituents looking backward, with adjustments if a name did not exist in earlier periods.

The reports linked on this website were developed by students in the Lubar College of Business Investment Management Certificate Program under the supervision of faculty.*

Wisconsin 30 Companies

Listed in order of market value as of December 31, 2024

StateRank 12/31/2024TickerCompanyMarket Value
($ Millions)
12/31/2024
DateReport
WI1FISVFiserv, Inc.116,867Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI2ROKRockwell Automation, Inc.32,315Dec-24Available Upon Request
WI3WECWEC Energy Group, Inc.29,875Dec-24Click Here for Report
WI4SNASnap-on Incorporated17,819Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI5LNTAlliant Energy Corporation15,175Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI6EXASExact Sciences Corporation10,399Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI7RRXRegal Rexnord Corporation10,274Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI8AOSA.O. Smith Corporation9,890Dec-24Available Upon Request
WI9GNRCGenerac Holdings Inc.9,225Dec-23Available Upon Request
WI10ZWSZurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation6,330Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI11BMIBadger Meter Corp.6,239Dec-24Available Upon Request
WI12OSKOshkosh Corp6,186Dec-23Available Upon Request
WI13MODModine Manufacturing Company6,087
WI14MTGMGIC Investment Corporation6,007Dec-24Available Upon Request
WI15SNDRSchneider National, Inc. Class B5,129Dec-23Available Upon Request
WI16PLXSPlexus Corp.4,239Dec-24Available Upon Request
WI17ASBAssociated Banc-Corp3,902
WI18HOGHarley-Davidson, Inc.3,863Dec-24Available Upon Request
WI19BRCBrady Corporation Class A3,527
WI20APAMArtisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. Class A3,459Dec-23Available Upon Request
WI21MGEEMGE Energy, Inc.3,402Dec-24Available Upon Request
WI22SXTSensient Technologies Corp.3,019Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI23MANManpowerGroup Inc.2,709Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI24SPBSpectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.2,308
WI25EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp. Class A2,235Dec-24Available Upon Request
WI26REVGREV Group, Inc.1,657Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI27NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc.1,596
WI28KSSKohl’s Corporation1,563Dec-25Click Here for Report
WI29MRTNMarten Transport, Ltd.1,271
WI30BFCBank First Corp992
Additional Wisconsin CompaniesTickerCompanyDateReport
WisconsinDLTHDuluth Holdings IncDec-24Available Upon Request
WisconsinGWWWW GraingerDec-24Click Here for Report
WisconsinJOUTJohnson Outdoors Inc.Dec-25Click Here for Report
WisconsinKOSSKoss CorporationDec-25Click Here for Report
WisconsinLELands’ End IncDec-24Available Upon Request
WisconsinMTWThe Manitowoc Company, Inc.Dec-23Available Upon Request
WisconsinWEYSWeyco Group IncDec-24Available Upon Request
Illinois CompaniesTickerCompanyDateReport
IllinoisUALUnited Airlines Holdings IncDec-25Click Here for Report
IllinoisZBRAZebra Technologies Corporation Dec-25Click Here for Report

*Disclaimer: The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee is not a registered investment, legal, or tax advisor or broker/dealer. This work was completed by students in the Investment Management Certificate program in UWM’s Lubar College of Business under faculty supervision. All investment/financial opinions expressed are from their research and are intended as educational material. Although best efforts are made to ensure that all information is accurate and up to date, occasional unintended errors or misprints may occur.


Index Research – Impact of Tariffs

The reports linked on this website were developed by students in the Lubar College of Business Investment Management Certificate Program under the supervision of faculty.*

Since the Trump administration took office on January 20th, one word has dominated trade and economic headlines. Tariffs. As a central pillar of the administration’s trade strategy, tariffs have been used both as a negotiating tool and a means of protecting domestic industries. Broad-based measures now include a 10% universal tariff on most imports and a steep 145% tariff on all Chinese goods, however, there has been a recent 90-day pause. While certain strategic exemptions have been granted, such as conditional relief for USMCA partners and exclusions for tech-related imports like smartphones and displays, the overall trade landscape remains volatile. Countries such as China, the EU, and Canada have responded with threats of WTO disputes and retaliatory tariffs, further amplifying global uncertainty. As firms struggle to navigate shifting criteria and unpredictable rate changes, tariffs have become a defining force in international trade policy and a major source of economic risk.

When analyzing the Wisconsin Index, 14 of the 30 companies (Figure 1) fall within the industrials sector, a group highly sensitive to tariffs and global trade disruptions. Due to their cyclical nature, industrials typically underperform during periods of economic uncertainty and slowing growth, making the index particularly vulnerable in the current tariff-heavy environment. This raises an important question: How did the Wisconsin Index respond during the first U.S.-China trade war, and what is it signaling now amid renewed tariff tensions? Understanding this performance history offers valuable insight into how the index may behave as trade policies continue to evolve.

Figure 1: Wisconsin Index Sectors

SectorNumber of Companies
Industrials14
Financials6
Utilities3
Consumer Discretionary2
Information Technology2
Healthcare1
Materials1
Consumer Staples1

The first U.S.-China trade war (2018–2019) was largely strategic and targeted, with tariffs aimed at specific sectors like steel, aluminum, and approximately $360 billion worth of Chinese imports. The Trump administration positioned these measures as leverage to address concerns over intellectual property theft, forced technology transfers, and longstanding trade imbalances. Although the tariffs were impactful, they were relatively focused in scope, and the overall economic disruption was limited where many companies were able to adapt through supply chain adjustments or passed costs on to consumers, resulting in less severe consequences than initially feared. However, let’s see how the Wisconsin Index, specifically industrials, performed during the first trade war (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Wisconsin Index Contribution to Returns (First Trade War)

Contribution scatter plot by sector, 12/29/2017–12/31/2018. Most sectors cluster near the center. Industrials (circled in red) is the clear outlier, with roughly -25% total return and -7% contribution to return. Health Care and [Unassigned] are the top performers on the right.

During the first trade war, the Wisconsin Index suffered significant losses, with 77% of its holdings, primarily from the Industrials, Financials, Materials, and Consumer Discretionary sectors, posting total returns worse than -15%. These sectors were particularly vulnerable to rising tariffs, supply chain disruptions, and weakening global demand, which eroded corporate earnings and investor confidence. The heavy concentration in cyclical industries made the index especially susceptible to macroeconomic shocks, highlighting the indexes economic sensitivity to international trade tensions.

Following the resolution of the trade war and toward the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Industrials sector experienced a strong rebound, driven by a resurgence in manufacturing and increased overall production. Pent-up consumer demand, government stimulus, and a renewed focus on domestic supply chains contributed to the sector’s growth. Companies ramped up capital expenditures, infrastructure spending picked up, and labor market conditions gradually improved, all of which helped fuel industrial output. This post-pandemic recovery phase marked a pivotal shift, as firms sought to localize production and reduce dependency on global supply chains, further strengthening the performance of industrial equities. As a result, the Wisconsin Index saw a significant boost, benefiting from its heavy exposure to industrial and cyclical sectors (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Wisconsin Index Contribution to Returns (Post First Trade War 12/30/2022 – 12/29/2023)

Contribution scatter plot by sector, 12/30/2022–12/29/2023. Industrials (circled in red) is the standout performer, with roughly +20% total return and ~16% contribution to return. Most other sectors cluster near the bottom left with low contributions. [Unassigned] has the highest total return (~140%) but a more modest contribution (~5%).

Looking back at the first trade war, followed by the subsequent recovery and now facing a new round of trade tensions, one might reasonably expect the Industrials sector to be underperforming significantly. However, that hasn’t been the case so far. The Industrials sector is currently posting a total return of approximately -5%, a relatively modest decline compared to roughly -20% experienced during the first trade war. This is particularly notable given that the current trade conflict is far more intense, broader in scope, and involves a wider range of countries (see Figure 9).This resilience raises several important questions. Are investors less concerned this time around because the initial trade war did not lead to a full-blown recession? Is there a belief that companies have since adapted to protectionist policies by diversifying supply chains or reshoring operations? Or perhaps the full economic impact of the new tariffs has yet to be realized, and markets are still underestimating the long-term consequences. It’s also possible that current macroeconomic conditions, such as strong labor markets, steady domestic demand, and fiscal support, are temporarily cushioning the blow. Still, the situation remains fluid, and Industrials could face renewed pressure if global trade frictions escalate or if delayed effects of the policy shift begin to surface more broadly in corporate earnings and capital investment.

Figure 4: Wisconsin Index Contribution to Returns (Second Trade War 1/17/2025 – 5/14/2025)

Contribution scatter plot by sector, 1/17/2025–5/14/2025. Most sectors cluster near the center with modest returns. Industrials (circled in red) is a notable underperformer with roughly -5% total return and approximately -2.6% contribution. Financials and Materials are the top contributors on the right, while Consumer Discretionary has the worst total return at around -25%.

The Wisconsin Index’s journey through multiple economic cycles and trade conflicts reveals both its vulnerabilities and its capacity for resilience. Historically, its heavy exposure to Industrials and other cyclical sectors has left it susceptible to global trade disruptions, as seen during the first U.S.-China trade war. Yet the current environment, despite being defined by broader, more aggressive tariff measures, has not produced the same degree of underperformance. This change raises meaningful questions about whether companies and investors have become more adept at navigating protectionist policies, or whether the true economic fallout has simply been delayed.

While short-term fundamentals such as domestic demand, fiscal support, and strong labor markets appear to be cushioning the impact for now, the long-term trajectory of the Wisconsin Index will depend on how trade dynamics evolve, how companies adapt, and how global growth trends unfold. The current moment offers both risk and opportunity, and the coming year may serve as a critical test of the index’s structural strength and cyclical positioning.

Contact
Dr. G. Kevin Spellman, CFA
David O. Nicholas Director of Investment Management
Professor of Practice, Finance
Lubar Hall S442
608-334-2110
spellman@uwm.edu
Index Research – Impact of Tariffs