Colloquia

Summer 2022 Colloquium Series

Reassessing Nonprofit Capacities and Leadership During the COVID-19 Crisis

Many nonprofits have expressed concerns that an extended period of revenue uncertainty caused by COVID-19 and a significant change in operations required to sustain services during the pandemic jeopardizes nonprofits’ ability to promptly address vital human needs and make progress toward the mission. Nonprofit scholars and practitioners demonstrate that nonprofit responses to a fiscal shock involve a complex set of managerial decisions meant to balance actions for obtaining resources required to fill revenue gaps and maintain the delivery of services and programs at their total capacity. The HBI Summer Colloquium Series presents four academic studies focused on nonprofit responses to the initial impact of the revenue crisis caused by the pandemic (April – August 2021). Although each study looks at nonprofit performance and decision-making from a different analytical perspective, all studies shed light on how the nonprofit organizations from Wisconsin responded to the crisis and what organizational and contextual factors influenced the decision outcomes.


Session 1: Reducing staff to survive the pandemic: Make fiscal conditions, service demands, and board involvement explain layoff decisions of nonprofits during COVID-19?

May 18, 2022 – 9.00 am

Authors:

  • Erica Ceka, Asst. Professor, Department of Public & Nonprofit Administration
  • Douglas Ihrke, Executive Director, Helen Bader Institute for Nonprofit Management

Summary: This study assesses factors that influence nonprofit decisions to reduce staff to cope with revenue uncertainty caused by COVID-19. The results confirm earlier findings on the importance of fiscal conditions on nonprofit capacity to sustain its workforce after the initial revenue shock. The findings also reveal that despite revenue uncertainties, nonprofits will be less likely to reduce staff when there is an increased demand for services offered to marginalized groups. However, the results indicate that the involvement of board members in planning will increase the probability of a layoff decision.


Session 2: Did the Paycheck Protection Program stimulate nonprofit capacity to resume operations, sustain services, and keep employees?

June 15, 2022 – 9.00 am

Authors:

  • Erica Ceka, Asst. Professor, Department of Public & Nonprofit Administration
  • Lora Warner, Assoc. Professor, UW-Green Bay, Public & Environmental Affairs Department

Summary: This study investigates whether access to the Paycheck Protection Program increases the capacity of nonprofit organizations to resume services after the initial impact of COVID-19 and sustain their operations and workforce for at least 12 weeks. The results reveal that the loan recipient nonprofits report significantly greater capacity to fund payroll and continue service delivery than the non-recipients. However, the study does not confirm a significant effect of the Paycheck Protection Program loans on the capacity of Wisconsin nonprofits to resume services after the initial fiscal impact.


Session 3: Assessing the role of beneficiaries and boards on nonprofit decisions to collaborate during COVID-19

July 20, 2022 – 9.00 am

Authors:

  • Erica Ceka, Asst. Professor, Department of Public & Nonprofit Administration
  • Douglas Ihrke, Executive Director, Helen Bader Institute for Nonprofit Management
  • Bryce Lord, Associate Director, Helen Bader Institute for Nonprofit Management

Summary: This study analyzes conditions that facilitate nonprofit decisions to collaborate with local governments and nonprofits during the COVID-19 crisis. The study results demonstrate that nonprofits are more likely to collaborate with other nonprofits when they can fund the payroll, are highly concerned about the inability to reach vulnerable groups, and when demands for services offered to vulnerable groups are increasing. The findings also show that decisions to initiate collaborations with local governments are more likely to be implemented when nonprofits report higher demands for their services and are more concerned about their inability to pay rent or mortgage. Further, the findings reveal that the involvement of board members has a significant effect on nonprofit decisions to initiate collaborations with nonprofits and local governments.


Session 4: Weak leadership, unprepared staff, and vulnerable beneficiaries: Shedding light on performance concerns of nonprofits during the pandemic

August 17, 9.00 am

Authors:

  • Erica Ceka, Asst. Professor, Department of Public & Nonprofit Administration
  • Douglas Ihrke, Executive Director, Helen Bader Institute for Nonprofit Management
  • Alexis Nehmer, MS Candidate, Urban Studies, Department of Public & Nonprofit Administration

Summary: This study analyzes the connection between nonprofit capacity to adapt during uncertain times and significant performance concerns experienced by the nonprofits at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings show that nonprofits’ concerns about their performance at the mission level are subjective to their technical capabilities to transition their services to the virtual space, employees’ competencies, and characteristics of nonprofit beneficiaries. In addition, the results report that nonprofits’ concerns related to their fiscal performance are conditioned by nonprofits ’capacities to generate new revenue streams or services. The findings suggest that even if innovative tactics and competent human resources are critical for nonprofit performance, the development of adaptive capacity begins with visionary and strategic leadership.

The Childhood Cancer Program at Northwestern Mutual

Friday, February 28 2020 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm

Kenwood Interdisciplinary Research Complex (KIRC)
Room 1130

Jodi Nolte, Strategic Philanthropy Consultant, Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

In 2012, Northwestern Mutual chose to create a stronger and more visible presence for Northwestern Mutual’s charitable giving on a national scale via the Northwestern Mutual Foundation. By strategically focusing its philanthropic efforts on one cause, and employing the principles of cause branding, the Northwestern Mutual Foundation has proven Northwestern Mutual’s commitment to corporate social responsibility and elevated the company’s reputation with policyowners and consumers. The Northwestern Mutual Foundation used a methodical approach to evaluate social causes and select the one on which it would ultimately focus its national efforts. The process included evaluating social causes against specific criteria and examining competitor’s philanthropic efforts. Upon completing a thorough analysis, Northwestern Mutual selected childhood cancer on which to focus its philanthropic efforts. Once childhood cancer was selected, the Northwestern Mutual Foundation defined the vision, mission, and objectives of the program, as well as partners and specific activations to implement the program across its home office and field financial network. The Childhood Cancer Program focuses on research, family support, and survivorship to achieve its mission, and the Foundation works with high-impact, best-in-class nonprofits that work to achieve substantial, sustained results, and create larger systemic change. As a result of Northwestern Mutual’s Childhood Cancer Program, preliminary research data has been developed, numerous articles have been published, and several clinical trials have been advanced. Northwestern Mutual’s brand has been enhanced, and it has a more positive corporate reputation.

“Community” in Fundraising Practice: Meanings, Mechanisms, & Metaphors

Friday, February 7 2020 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm

Kenwood Interdisciplinary Research Complex (KIRC)
Room 1130

Ruth Hansen, Assistant Professor, Management, UW-Whitewater (HBI Faculty Affiliate)

This study uses qualitative content analysis to better understand how the individuals raising funds for charities understand the meaning of “community,” especially regarding the relationship of the organization to its donors and its clients, and how they incorporate this understanding into the practice of fundraising.  By juxtaposing analysis of appeal letters (actual work products) and interviews, it examines both how fundraisers think and speak about “community” in the process of writing, and how the concept is used in expressed behavior.

“Community” is used to convey several distinct meanings, some of which are inclusive, some of which exclude.  It often has an aspect of interdependence.  The presentation will discuss the meanings and mechanisms of “community” identified, along with a popular metaphor, furthering the understanding of fundraising practice and its embeddedness within social norms.