2006 Publications
ATOMS Project. (2006). ATOMS Project technical report – N=1 assistive technology (AT) outcomes summit – May 3, 2006. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://web.archive.org/web/20191106230624/http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/neq1summitreport.html.
Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Re-examining the role of assistive technology in learning. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Closing the Gap, 25(5), 10-11, 26.
Edyburn, D. L. & Robyler, M. D. (2006). Technology in special education. In M.D. Robyler (Ed.), Integrating educational technology into teaching (4th ed.) (pp. 407-424). Upper Sadle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Failure is not an option: Collecting, reviewing, and acting on evidence for using technology to enhance academic performance. Learning and Leading With Technology, 34(1), 20-23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281317900_Failure_is_not_an_option_Collecting_reviewing_and_acting_on_evidence_for_using_technology_to_enhance_academic_performance
Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Cognitive prostheses for students with mild disabilities: Is this what assistive technology looks like? Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(4), 62-65.
Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Student performance data: Extracting meaning has never been easier. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(3), 52-54.
Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Searching for evidence of effectiveness of assistive or instructional technology interventions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 74-78.
Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Online survey tools. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(1), 51-53.
Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Evaluating academic performance: With and without technology. MACUL Journal, 26(4), 26-27, 48.
Edyburn, D. L. (2006). What’s new concerning assistive technology outcomes in education? Technology Special Interest Section Quarterly, 16(2), 1-4.
Fennema-Jansen, S., Whyte, F., Smith, R. O., Brayton, A., & Jansen, C. (2006). ATOMS Project technical report – Methods to identify assistive technology device use. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://web.archive.org/web/20210425170843/http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/tr-fs-methodsidentifyuse.html.
Fennema-Jansen, S. A., Binion, M., Edyburn, D. L., & Smith, R. O. (2006). Making a large database available for assistive technology research. Proceedings of the RESNA 29th International Conference on Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology.
Lauer, A., Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2006). ATOMS Project technical report – Factors in assistive technology device abandonment: Replacing “abandonment” with “discontinuance”. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://web.archive.org/web/20210426024228/http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-discontinuance.html.
Mendonca, R. & Smith, R. O. (2006). MED-AUDIT (Medical Equipment Device-Accessibility and Universal Design Information Tool): Usability analysis. Proceedings of the RESNA 29th International Conference on Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology. https://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/legacy/conference/proceedings/2006/Research/Outcomes/Mendonca.html
Noll, A., Owens, L., Smith, R. O., & Schwanke, T. D. (2006). Survey of state vocational rehabilitation counselor roles and competencies in assistive technology. WORK: Journal of Prevention, Assessment, & Rehabilitation, 27(4) 413-419. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17148879/
Noll, A. & Schwanke, T. D. (2006). Vocational rehabilitation counselors perception of role and competencies in assistive technology. Proceedings of the RESNA 29th International Conference on Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology. https://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/legacy/conference/proceedings/2006/Research/PP/Noll.html
Olson, C. H. (2006). Taxonomy for classifying writing devices used by students with learning disabilities. Proceedings of the RESNA 29th International Conference on Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology. https://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/legacy/conference/proceedings/2006/index.html
Rust, K. L. & Smith, R. O. (2006). Perspectives of outcome data from assistive technology developers. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits (electronic journal), 3(1),34-52. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20070223092154/http://www.atia.org/(Archived Copy).
Silverman, M. & Smith, R. O. (2006). Consequential validity of an assistive technology supplement for the School Functional Assessment. Assistive Technology, 18(2), 155-165. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17236474/
Smith, R. O., Rust, K. L., Jansen, C., & Seitz, J., (2006). ATOMS Project technical report – The ICF in the context of assistive technology (AT) interventions and outcomes. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://web.archive.org/web/20210426153530/http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/icf.html.
Smith, R. O., Seitz, J., Jansen, C., & Rust, K. L. (2006). ATOMS Project technical report – Models and taxonomies relating to assistive technology. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://web.archive.org/web/20200701191736/http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/tr-fs-taxonomiesmodels.html.