The Chair attended the Board of Regents meeting. Most of the meeting was spent on closed session items with the Chancellor. Discussed the policy and procedure around voting privileges for academic staff.
Chair O’Connor is attending the Board of Regents meeting later this week. Provost Britz updated us on additional details surrounding the budget plan process. The UC accepted the DACA resolution discussed in the Senate. The resolution will be forwarded to the Rules committee for inclusion in the next Senate meeting.
Chair Kris O’Connor updated the committee on the most recent state budget. Dr. Nigel Rothels updated the UC on the history, programming, data, and outcomes of the Office of Undergraduate Research. Dean Stan Stojkovic requested and was granted augmentation of the Helen Bader School of Social Welfare Executive Committee. The UC reviewed and provided feedback on the selection process for chancellors and UW-System senior leadership being revised by the Regent Administrative Work Group.
Provost Britz updated the UC on the budget, the freedom of speech panel event being held next week, updates on campus administrative searches, enrollment and retention rates, the pay plan, performance based funding, sabbatical support, and dean leadership development. The Chair of the Academic Staff Committee updated the UC on policy updates pertaining to contracts, titling, and distinguished Academic Staff criteria.
Chancellor Mone met with the UC and discussed the capital budget, pending legislation around freedom of speech on campus, accountability performance management funding, student enrollments, faculty workload policy provision in pending legislation. Mark Harris met with the UC and discussed R1 renewal. The UC discussed creating a Senate resolution pertaining to the DACA ruling.
Provost Britz visited and announced that campus Dean searches are moving forward. He also gave updates on the budget and enrollment. The UC discussed a 1-page summary of the timeline and data that will contribute to evaluation of R1 renewal.
The UC Chair reported that he will begin regularly meeting with the Provost after the next UC meeting. The capital budget passed by JFC was announced today. Based upon the report of the Chancellor’s cabinet there was discussion about the undergraduate research program with a recommendation that the UC obtain more information about the program at a future meeting. There was a request for a brief handout about what criteria will contribute to the R1 renewal data to share with faculty who can use for departmental discussions and planning to support the R1 renewal. The UC will send an email to inform faculty about the purpose and role of the Senate and UC along with an invitation to attend meetings. Dean search for the College of Health Science and Lubar School of Business call for faculty volunteers will be evaluated at the next meeting. Faculty salary compression was discussed and there was agreement to revisit the issue with campus administration.
The next UC meeting is September 5th.
At its first meeting of the 2017-18 academic year, UC Chair O’Connor updated the committee on his transition into the role. He also discussed a recent meeting with the chair of the APBC regarding operational procedures for that committee over the coming year.
An issue was raised by one of the committee members regarding the use of confidential letters submitted as part of campus research awards and distinguished professor nominations, which the committee plans to address with the Provost at his next visit with the committee.
The primary business for this week concerned identifying University Committee representatives for the various standing faculty committees and the upcoming College of Health Sciences and Lubar School of Business Dean searches.
The next UC meeting is August 29th.
The University Committee started with a visit by the Chancellor, who provided updates on the budget and the Strategic Opportunities Workgroup. The Chancellor was cautiously optimistic about the budget for UWM, pending final approval by the legislature. He also provided an update on the potential impact of Foxconn on growth of the College of Engineering to meet the future workforce needs.
In his report, UC Chair Reisel provided a summary of the last Chancellor’s Extended Cabinet Meeting. Of interest were discussions regarding the placement of anonymous drug dropboxes on campus. There is a search for a secure site on campus that would also afford anonymity. The only current location is in the UWM Police headquarters.
UWM Police Chief LeMire attended the meeting to provide information regarding the deployment of body cameras on all UWM police officers in the coming months. They are developing policies for their use, including when the system should be switched on and off. In addition, the system will have the ability to automatically blur faces in recordings if necessary. Chief LeMire also provide an update on three internals teams focused on expanded nighttime bike patrols, community policing efforts, and handling of sensitive crimes.
Under new business, the committee approved an Executive Committee augmentation request and discussed the consistency of the application of the campus workload policy across departments and colleges. The committee will follow up with the Provost regarding campus information on workload consistency.
Finally, the University Committee bid farewell to John Reisel, John Boyland, and Michael Brondino as their terms on the committee ended. Their efforts are greatly appreciated, particularly the work of Chair John Reisel. Welcome to the three new members of the University Committee, Jennifer Doering, Enrique Figueroa, and Mark Schwartz. Their tenure on the committee officially starts at the committee’s next meeting, August 22nd.
Today, the UC worked on cleaning up language in S-46, the SAAP on Search and Screen Committees. The current version of S-46 has some conflicting language in its descriptions of faculty/UC representation on administrative search and screen committees. The UC decided to suggest to the Policy Advisory Committee to revise the language to be consistent. The revised language will reflect that UC members are the preferred choice for representatives on the committees, but that the UC can choose to designate another faculty member to represent the UC if they feel that the faculty member is well suited for the role.
The UC also reviewed some language in the current campus workload policy, but chose to leave the language as it stands.